About Us 

Dr. Fazal Naeem— Doctor | Healthcare Profession

Reg No:- QH-19831-A

Reg No:- 157338

Ref: No- 002- Sara/2008-2009

HRA No: HRA/500/F/MR/RQH/10

HRA /500/R/MR/RQH/19

K.P.H.C:- HCC/HQ/HR/2025/8782-112

Generative Ai in Health Care

I am a healthcare professional and Doctor with experience in healthcare assessment, natural medicine, homeopathic treatment, and emerging healthcare technologies. I work as a KPHC Health Assessor for the Government of Pakistan, with a professional focus on healthcare standards, assessment, quality, and patient-centered practice.

My academic and professional journey combines natural medicine, homeopathy, healthcare skills, and artificial intelligence. I completed my PhD in Natural Medicine and earned my DHMS (Diploma in Homoeopathic Medical System) through the National Council for Homeopathy, Government of Pakistan, in 2010, and I have continued my professional practice in healthcare.

I am also a Health Skills Boost student and have completed training in Generative AI in Healthcare, developing an interest in how artificial intelligence can support healthcare education, clinical workflows, health communication, research, documentation, and healthcare innovation.

 practical insights and perspectives on:

- Healthcare, wellness, and preventive health

- Natural medicine and complementary healthcare

- Homeopathic treatment and health education

- Healthcare quality and assessment

- Generative AI and its applications in healthcare

- Digital health and emerging healthcare technologies

- Healthcare education, innovation, and professional development

🌿 About Us

Welcome to Daily Tips 312 — your trusted destination for natural health, holistic wellness, and time-tested healing traditions.

At Daily Tips 312, we believe that true wellness comes from balance, prevention, and harmony with nature. Our mission is to empower you with practical, reliable, and culturally rooted health knowledge that supports your everyday life.

👑 Improvement Note for Google Content policy 

Google has done a very good job by placing health into a separate and sensitive category.

But as a doctor and a health professional, I want to raise some very important questions. I sincerely hope that Google's team and Policy Center will consider this as a serious matter.

My first question is about double standards.

Most medicines in natural health are considered safe and harmless. It is true that some natural herbs are toxic and people should avoid using them on their own. They should only be tried in the presence of a professional and all precautions must be followed. But overall, the side effects of natural and herbal medicines are almost negligible. This is not just my claim, but it is stated by the official website of the USA.[Reference]

On the other hand, it has been proven through research that all allopathic medicines have side effects and dangerous reactions. Even today, Google promotes those same medicines in the health category, for which thousands of proofs of side effects can be easily presented. This double standard is not acceptable.[Reference]

We all know how much AI has progressed, but in the field of health, especially medicines without side effects, people only recognize them by words like herbal, organic, and natural. This is a reality that cannot be denied.

My second question is about practical experience vs. laboratory research.

A regular practitioner does not have a research lab and resources to spend hundreds of thousands on research. Policy makers should understand this point.

Let me give an example of the Sadhus in India who sit in front of fire in extreme heat for many hours. Can any laboratory or any research prove or disprove this? If someone says this is just practice, he has very limited knowledge. Some things are only learned through direct experience.

Out of curiosity, I started to investigate this. One Sadhu invited me to try an herb himself. He claimed that he can sit in front of fire because of that herb. When I tested it, I found it to be true. Later, many patients used it during the hot summer days and they felt coolness in the heat. Was that a lie? Will the Policy Center call the Sadhu a liar or call the herb wrong just because it is not mentioned in any book or library?

Another important point:

In heavy snowfall and extreme cold, these same Sadhus take a bath every morning in the open, in the cold water of a river or canal, which an ordinary person cannot even imagine. Some people claim this is also just practice and it may be possible. But for a person who has no habit and has never done this in cold weather, when he takes a small amount of that herb on the advice of the Sadhus, no matter how cold it is, he feels complete warmth.

To confirm this, when I myself took a small amount of that herb, I started sweating and felt warm even in the cold. The same results were seen when people living in snowy areas used it. Does Google have an answer to this? Is Google capable of answering these two questions, or does the Policy Center only know whether an herb is harmful or beneficial?

A common person does not have the power or resources to spend on research to prove this, especially when there is no visible commercial benefit.

I can give thousands of such examples.

A person who has expertise in any field can learn many things from experience that are not written in any book and cannot be explained even in today's modern age. Simply removing all content that shows a new path to humanity, and calling the narrow-mindedness and ignorance of some critics as "science" without any reason, is wrong.

If a person says something that no one has said before, the policy makers have no right to reject his lifelong experiences, observations, and generation-to-generation tested facts, or to remove them from Google, just because they do not understand it or have limited knowledge.

If this narrow-mindedness is not stopped, humanity will suffer a great loss. Does the Policy Center not know that many lost things were discovered before and surprised the world? There are still many wonders in different parts of the world that today's science cannot answer. Why are they still unsolved?

Everything is possible, but we must stop narrow-mindedness, stop giving policy-making power to the wrong people, and stop removing everything that opens a new path for humanity.

Instead of suspending, blocking, or removing an account and hiding the content from people without even reading it properly, every person's profile and experience should be verified and then published.

 By Dr Fazal Naeem 

Reg No:- QH-19831-A

Reg No:- 157338

Ref: No- 002- Sara/2008-2009

HRA No: HRA/500/F/MR/RQH/10

HRA /500/R/MR/RQH/19

K.P.H.C:- HCC/HQ/HR/2025/8782-112

Generative Ai in Health Care